But situations may arise when you need to prioritize what needs to be fixed first. Having your software considered to be “buggy” does not helps sales in any way. In general, you can say that the bug-fixing time is an important factor for bug related analysis, such as measuring software quality. If the published timeline shows it has taken months to fix a bug it reflects badly on your company, and could lead customers to question whether you care about security.
When you are working on a new version, a critical bug in the old version is holding you back as long as you don’t know how to fix it.This could result in a zero-day vulnerability. Even if a vulnerability is found by a researcher taking the high road of responsible disclosure, once the cat is out of the bag, there is a good chance others will be able to duplicate the researcher’s effort.Improved security by fixing the vulnerability.There are some very obvious reasons why we want to push and install bug fixes as soon as possible. The ability to better understand and predict bug-fixing time can help a project team better estimate software maintenance efforts and better manage software projects. So, on a per bug basis it is the time between being made aware of an existing bug and issuing a fix for the bug. “Bug-fixing time” refers to the time required to fix known bugs. What is one group doing better and can the others take lessons from that? Or is it something we have to take as it comes? The average time to fix a bug seems to vary depending on the platform the bug was found in. This phenomenon starts at the side of the developers. There are many reasons why we want a bug fixed as soon as we can, but there are also plenty of reasons why doing it “right now” is not an option.